The Seven Seas

Newspaper from United States of America -

Published in Turkey - Political debates and analysis - 04 Aug 2016 11:15 - 27

Greetings,

As you know, our opponents were complaining about our strength for a long time and they are using our strategies and principles for propaganda purposes since they could not beat us on the battlefield.

In the last article of our Supreme Commander, we already explained our mentality about NAP offers and attacking a country. We always offer fair peace agreements and we do not ask anything humiliating.

Despite our kindness, our opponents are still whining but lately we had an incident that I would like to share with you, in order to explain a difference between our alliance and the other one.

This is the NAP offer that proposed by Canada to the USA:

1. USA surrenders core regions; Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa and Nebraska.

2. The USA pays for war expenditures, the amount shall be set by Canada government and will exceed no more than 200 gold.

3. No wars shall be allowed between the parties, direct or through RW, in the set period of no less than 30 days after signing.

4. The USA shall guarantee, no member of MDP, essentially Japan, and Portugal, will lead any wars or campaigns against Canada.

5. Breaking any point will lead to a fine of X (set amount), with the amount being set upon signing.

We, of course, rejected this offer. However, a UNITY-aligned member, Canada proved the intention of UNITY.

Kind Regards
spitfireYG
Secretary of Public Relations

Support

hoss1965 arith Kinyas Ancestral Warhaft Alien Overlord lmperius

Comments (27)