Židovske novice

nime - Newspaper from Slovenia -

Published in Slovenia - Political debates and analysis - 18 Nov 2016 06:21 - 3

Hi everybody :D How do you do :D

We all know deeply in our self behind the curtain of chat and expectation of our country's that the Mutual Protection Pact is to OP :D  For 5 g you get your self for a month a help and protection form one country yea you get that back just in one battle when you are fighting an get True ally medal.  And so on...

So because I think the changes are need it but not in this way I think is there a better way to create MPP less powerful. Let's face it to create more sites on battlefield we need smt else which would broke strong allies and were are two or three strong countries the others just follow because they know what they will get if they will collaborate whit them.

THE BETTER WAY BY ME :D

  • First lets create MPP appropriate by name. You can have only 6 MPP. And it is working only if you defend your territory, not if you are attacking. So the country A and B have MPP they can fight true that only when one  thews are been attacked by other countries. The law wil cost still 10g

  • Second Lets create new pact. The military alliance. Yes this one will be limited to 6  pact. And is working like MPP now


That is how i consider this problem can be solved share comment give you ideas maybe admins will hear us.

NIME

Support

spagePanzer Ace

Comments (3)

Aha...lep pozdrav iz Hrvatske...oni mi dajo helice s popustom :-p
6 mpp bad 10 mpp can be better
Look, new change is allowing 6 mpp but with country itself it means 7 already. Thats enough.