Journal créé en Japan
Publier en United States of America - Analyses financières - 14 Jan 2020 11:53 - 7
1. Naval warfare - - - > uninstall
Why?
We are going back to original idea of warfare in eRev, restoring the significance of the key regions in this e-world, as the bridge regions between continents. This way game becomes more interesting because of introduction of strategic development in conquering the e-world.
(I admit a specific interest of US in this... All core regions will be liberated with this simple update 😁)
2. New concept of economy...
Not only unification of weapon's industry, also it is a chance for a new start for everyone and especially idea of limitation of number of companies. Yeah... Kill the big producers and give back sense to economical module in this game. We will have interesting economical development in many countries here.
3. I don't see the point if this is not a way to reduce an enormous difference between older and new accounts.
This article is my strong recommendation for accepting the idea of updating (upgrading) this game.
Why?
We are going back to original idea of warfare in eRev, restoring the significance of the key regions in this e-world, as the bridge regions between continents. This way game becomes more interesting because of introduction of strategic development in conquering the e-world.
(I admit a specific interest of US in this... All core regions will be liberated with this simple update 😁)
2. New concept of economy...
Not only unification of weapon's industry, also it is a chance for a new start for everyone and especially idea of limitation of number of companies. Yeah... Kill the big producers and give back sense to economical module in this game. We will have interesting economical development in many countries here.
3. I don't see the point if this is not a way to reduce an enormous difference between older and new accounts.
This article is my strong recommendation for accepting the idea of updating (upgrading) this game.
Donner
Kame SenninLeD ZePPeLiNTs1loTs1loTs1loTs1loFK_Lokomotiva_BiHVincentCommentaires (7)
1. It limits strategic possibilities in fact. So it is a setback, not an improvement.
2. You should try such grave new concepts at another server / game. Oh wait...
3. Robbing older characters? Fine idea. Why not giving something to newbies instead, if they are at reducing differences.
1.Limitations are bringing more stressful conditions for development. Automatically, it complicates strategy for conquering.
2. Limitation of number of companies... It gives a chance for specialization in production, reduce the number of products and makes more sense in trading. 3. Actually, it really does not matter, will they take something of the older accounts, or will they give something to new accounts... Simply, without new accounts game is dead, and without acceptable module for playing, for new players, why will they join? (OFC there is an alternative - legalizing account trading with some taxes)
we should all be given the chanse to get let s say 96% of the topstrenght... when a person has a character develop in strenght, he or she is more into buying gold for economical / warfare purposes of the game.
why don t they just copy those shadow boosters from erev, everyone gets one every day.. they let you have hit with 95% of dmg from the top fighter in that battle( i mean the strongest).. plus do the swap thing, where u can occasionally use a token to get smws str for a day
Returning core regions to their owners after uninstalling naval warfare is going to liberate USA instantly and make this country for the best country for the production with own bonuses. We are welcoming immigration to US after the update 😁
Only losers will vote yes!
Loosers are going back into the cage 😂