[PRP] New changes: https://www.erevollution.com/en/article/9469

v

g pa lu

Keep writing, your doing a good job.

4v/73s

s74

Alright... so let s get started. First: +1 for effort. +1 for actually putting up a party platform +1 for having stimulating party programs. Lots of merit in those. As for your party policies.............. I see a lot of contradictions and things that are simply not realistic.

If you see anything you don t like please enlighten us because This party was made to serve the people s interest and we will continue to do so by editing the platforms based on the people s reviews

Remember not only to criticize but also share some positive review We spent all 2 days and night writing this

v

I m with Abe on this one lads. I m using this quote as an example. Part IV. Section 15. 2. Support for the defense and liberation of small and oppressed rNations. 1. Support can literally be anything from saying keep it up to full on war 2. What is your definition of an oppressed nation? You could yourselves become dangerous to the international community by claiming Capitalist nations are oppressors. IV. 14. 4. Exposure of capitalist crimes and the promotion of a lively and fearless media in the rUSA. 1. Capitalist crimes? Capitalism is not a crime. Simply because you believe in Socialism does not make Capitalism wrong. 2. You also failed to mention how exactly your going to expose capitalist crimes 3. How are you going to turn the media lively and fearless? You can t just say that without giving any indication of how. IV.16.4 Finding ways to support and encourage working class and impoverished players by outflanking the capitalist game model. 1. finding ways . So, essentially, you haven t found any yet, but just wanted to include that 2. outflanking the capitalist game model? what does that even mean? 3. what s your definition of impoverished? Also note that all players have access to free food if necessary.

v

Umm Trumpets that is from the General Platform

:v

http://prntscr.com/bgxk4k

yolo

S79 v13

V+S

Alright... I ll drop here all my comment, please bear with me, it s very large.

22

Preamble - Actually the voices of ordinary people are heard. We live in democracy, people can vote, comment, write articles... And you weren’t “under-represented”, your party held a Congressional majority… I wouldn’t call that “under-represented”. Fighting elitism? Ok. Except that even though all people should have equal opportunities, it does not however mean they are fit to govern. Government should be based on meritocracy, on people who worked and served the country all the way there.

Immigration policy – So… in one hand you want more immigrants here by advertising immigration, on the other hand you want stricter guidelines in order to acquire citizenship. Truth is, advertising immigration is a dangerous game, the less the international community knows of our money, our economy and our military, the less likelihood there is for those countries to send spies or other political take-over agents. This policy can lead to potential endangerment of American sovereignty. Encouraging immigration is a bad policy, I’d leave that alone and keep strict guidelines with deep background checks on immigrants.

Economic policy – So there’s several ways to inject money other than what Tancred is doing and using the monetary market? Please be so kind to enlighten me PRP. Also raising import taxes? Are you nuts? Import taxes in a lot of goods are already at 99%, especially on raw materials. Vooztrollin even mentioned how he couldn’t regain his investment in a license here. Also please explain to me how it is exploiting a worker when most people in the country are getting paid somewhere around 13 to 17 USD per day of work… I’d really love to know. If anything, increasing the minimum wage will simply make things worse because it will not stimulate consumption, you need a balance between consumption and taxes if you want a sustainable economy. You are so concerned about the workers that you forgot about the bigger picture: a sustainable economy will give the workers what they need through increase production and good wages in the regular american pockets. Putting high taxes with high minimum wage will not get you there, you will be strangling business owners with the taxes, smashing production and overall the people will get less products they can buy or get.

Foreign Policy – So… aggressive policy and atrocious foreign policy. This is getting good really #Historylesson1 – Who started by threatening USA back in the day? Oh right. Japan! Did we have any intervention in it? Sure, we followed a directive to attack Ukraine from our old alliance EAGLE that has lead to it but overall, there was already tension between two countries when Japan sent us a threat back then. Short memory uh? Now let’s get to Mexico. Sure, you’re right, they did betray us as allies back then but tell me… what will you accomplish by stating that Mexico is a traitor in one line and in the other one saying that you wish to cooperate with MDP knowing that Mexico IS a member of MDP ? Also, you seem to be forgetting the part where Mexico is sacrificing itself for its allies right now under aggression from FAS and that they have been quite cooperative in the alliance. Isn’t that a proof of loyalty even after what happened in the past? Also, FAS… really? You want to build relations with an alliance that openly declared war on MDP and the members of MDP that attacked Spain? Tell me, how do you wish to accomplish this? How do you wish to approach an alliance in South America that is overall hostile towards USA at the current moment? Also closing the gap between richer and poorer nations? *begin#sarcasm*Sure! Let’s give away all our gold to small countries hoping that they will get up and running when we have things at home to sort out!*end#sarcasm* It is even rather insulting to the very class you are trying to defend that you’d support to use TAX money to close the gap to other countries. Basically what you’re saying is that you’d impoverish our country to make smaller countries richer…….We have USA to work with, your purpose should be to improve our country.

Other countries have their policies, their governments and their leaders to work and rise the country, like we do. And well, terrorism and crimes? Ok, if you want to expose PTOs, thieving and stuff, maybe… just maybe you’ll accomplish something, however, PTOs are allowed now by admins so you won’t accomplish anything and it’s very unlikely a PTO or a thief would care much about losing reputation.

Domestic Policy – Games and retention programs are always good. This is probably the strongest part of your platform, I am just skeptic in you making this work out with the rest of the platform you support. I won’t get on that tax part you included since I explored that already in the economic part.

Military – The first lines of this military policy are extremely concerning. Look, you have to understand several things: USA has full bonuses on her cores. I’ve said this countless times that it just makes our country have a gigantic target in its back. You can only avoid war for as long as you can but eventually and surely it WILL knock on your door regardless. The truth is that no matter how much “non-imperialist” you are; military conflict will be inevitable. It is extremely naïve if you think you can escape this by just supporting allies on your own through MPPs. This gets us to the next point: Being in an alliance. When you are part of an alliance you follow its directives because the HQ will be always reviewing the best strategies. You can’t expect to not get into a war through an alliance directive without that action having other unexpected diplomatic consequences, the same way you can’t expect to not be pressured by other countries to work together as a team because that is what means to be in an alliance: it means team work. It means that sometimes you have to sacrifice a battle to win another important front and expect the same to be done for you in case we are in trouble. About the war with Spain…. There is a remarkable contradiction here.

0.0 I think you just wrote a bible Abe

Look, both presidential candidates were up for non-offensive wars and keep a seemingly neutral stance but the truth is that you can’t keep a neutral stance when you have already joined an alliance. It’s too late for that and you can’t exactly hold accountable the opposition candidate when your own candidate supported the same and I am pretty positive he would not be able to achieve not going to war. Also, please tell me where did PRP oppose this war when PRP had and still has for a few more hours a Congressional majority and did not expose it’s concerns in the Congressional server to bring the government to reconsider. So please… spare me this part. You’re taking a political stance here simply because it is now convenient to you when in reality, when it truly mattered to take it, you didn’t do it, so please… don’t try to take me for a fool I am not.

I was on vacation when this war started and busy with some stuff If I was there I would have opposed it wholeheartedly

we will publish our official response in an article

Hm, I was going to be not happy that I read your 2 day article and skimmed over it in last 20min to point out some of the... eh... pointers that didn t really seem... great in overall but looks like someone beat me to it. And what you need is not positive review but constructive critism was it..? going to sleep now. Laters all.

07

o7

S.v

v

.