Газета издается в государстве Argentina
Опубликовано в государстве Ukraine - Политические дебаты и анализ - 12 Apr 2016 10:52 - 28
Because these countries do not create their own alliances France, Georgia, Ukranie, Japan and Serbia ??
1. It would be the most fair game
2. More Entertainment
3. equitable Damage to the eWorld
It would be very good that the presidents of these countries speak and consider making the game more fair and equitable, form new alliances and make the game more entertaining, give a second wind to make it more productive and Erevollution
I would like to see in the comments
1. It would be the most fair game
2. More Entertainment
3. equitable Damage to the eWorld
It would be very good that the presidents of these countries speak and consider making the game more fair and equitable, form new alliances and make the game more entertaining, give a second wind to make it more productive and Erevollution
I would like to see in the comments
Вознаградить
1st GermanBlackfuryGARDOSHTyraelSteffanoSLindburgyendericksonКомментарии (28)
http://www.erevollution.com/ua/article/4526 Ukraine has acted with this idea)
I like this alliance, but its good to one alliance: Croatia, France, Georgia, Ukraine. Other alliance: Serbia, Greece, Japan, Sweden.
I like TRS.
Ukraine founded his own Alliance, because strong countries do not take the same initiative and form more alliances so also could help small countries
good idea but late. 
Georgia, Argentina, Ukraine and Turkey = GAUT best aliance 
voted o7
More alliance, more balance (maybe)
lets make a fu** ONU meeting and discuss about this stuff, hell yeah i m crazy
V+S
voted o7
voted ő7
+ Moldova
o7
More alliances have a lot of good impact in the game. More players get involved and take crucial roles. Smaller countries don t seem so small in alliances and more
TRS FTW SAY NO! TO THE NEW ALLIANCE
They can t say no : )
Because these countries do not create their own alliances France, Georgia, Ukranie, Japan and Serbia ?? This sentence does not mean anything i dont undestand what is the meaning of this, why is there because and then ?? not plausible in english...
This is important. That balance must be established. An alliance strong, the other weak alliance. There is no entertainment. Balance would be fun to play.
Because they are cowards
I agree that multiple small alliances would bring much more fun than 2 alliance system (even balanced is no fun) ! Then you have more complex geopolitics, temporary super alliance between two groups, more wars, more power for small countries, ...
In two words MORE FUN
Why not ! o7
escribes en español pa la proxima o no endoso e.e
yenderickson jajaj flojera gooogle chrome click derecho traducir ajjaja :v
Ukraine created their Alliance twice already. First time due to their actions EAGLE was formed, then (due to their actions again) TRS was formed. I doubt anyone will be interested to create another alliance.